LET0345 Pragmatics
Escuela | Letras |
Área | |
Categorías | |
Créditos | 10 |
Prerequisitos
Sin requisitos
Sin restricciones
Calificaciones
Basado en 1 calificaciones:
4
Recomendación
1 al 5, mayor es mejor
-
Dificultad
1 al 5, mayor es más difícil
-
Créditos estimados
Estimación según alumnos.
4
Comunicación con profesores
1 al 5, mayor es mejor
CURSO:PRAGMATICS
TRADUCCION:PRAGMATICA
SIGLA:LET0345
CREDITOS:10
MODULOS:02
CARACTER:MINIMO
TIPO:CATEDRA
CALIFICACION:ESTANDAR
DISCIPLINA:LINGUISTICA
PALABRAS CLAVES:SPEECH ACTS, LANGUAGE IN USE, COOPERATION, RELEVANCE, POLITENESS
NIVEL FORMATIVO:PREGRADO
I.DESCRIPCIÓN DEL CURSO
This course introduces the grounds of the pragmatic study of language through the main different theoretical approaches and their application to specific speech events. Throughout the course students will interpret and debate the basis of the pragmatic study of language, examine the fundamental models of pragmatics, analyze and apply these models to specific speech events, and value the importance of the pragmatic perspective for the study of language.
II.RESULTADOS DE APRENDIZAJE
1.Debate the basis of the pragmatic study of language.
2.Examine the fundamental models of pragmatics.
3.Apply these models to specific speech events.
4.Value the importance of the pragmatic perspective for the study of language.
III.CONTENIDOS
1.The grounds of pragmatics
1.1.The origins and scope of the field of study
1.2.Key concepts
2.Main theories
2.1.Speech acts
2.2.The cooperative principle
2.3.Relevance theory
3.Contribution to the study of communication
3.1.Politeness
3.2.Relevance
3.3.Intercultural pragmatics and language teaching
IV.ESTRATEGIAS METODOLOGICAS
-Lectures.
-Analysis workshops.
-Critical reading of texts and subsequent discussion.
-Research paper tutorials.
V.ESTRATEGIAS METODOLOGICAS
-Tests: 50%
-Classwork: 20%
-Research paper: 30%
VI.BIBLIOGRAFIA
Minima
Austin, J.L.(1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 167 p.+ vii.
Brown, P. & S. Levinson(1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interactions. In Archer, D and Peter -Grundy (2011) (eds.) The Pragmatics Reader. P.p. 275-282. London and New York: Routledge.Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. y J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Searle, John (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, J.R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Eds.) Speech Acts. New York: 59-82.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Complementaria
Blum-Kulka, S, House, J and Gabriele Kasper. Cross- Cultural Pragmatics: requests and apologies. In Archer, D and Peter Grundy (2011) (eds.) The Pragmatics Reader. P.p. 344-353. London and New York: Routledge.
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Londres: Longman.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILE
FACULTAD DE LETRAS / AGOSTO 2021
Secciones
Sección 1 | Consuelo Gajardo |